This is a read-only mirror of pymolwiki.org
Difference between revisions of "Rms"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (10 revisions) |
|||
(9 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | [[Rms]] computes a RMS fit between two atom selections, but does not tranform the models after performing the fit. | |
− | |||
− | |||
===USAGE=== | ===USAGE=== | ||
− | + | <source lang="python"> | |
+ | rms (selection), (target-selection) | ||
+ | </source> | ||
+ | ===EXAMPLES=== | ||
+ | <source lang="python"> | ||
+ | fit ( mutant and name ca ), ( wildtype and name ca ) | ||
+ | </source> | ||
− | === | + | ===USER COMMENTS=== |
− | + | ||
+ | To determine the RMS without any fitting, see [[Rms_Cur]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Fit]], [[Rms]], [[Rms_Cur]] are finicky and only work when all atom identifiers match: segi, chain, resn, name, alt. If they don't then you'll need to use the alter command to change the identifiers to that they do -- typically that means clearing out the SEGI field, renaming chains, and sometimes renumbering. | ||
+ | |||
+ | I tried made two selections A, and D as | ||
+ | |||
+ | PyMOL>sel A, 1gh2 and n. CA and i. 65-99 | ||
+ | Selector: selection "A" defined with 35 atoms. | ||
+ | PyMOL>sel D, 1kao and n. CA and i. 64-98 | ||
+ | Selector: selection "D" defined with 35 atoms | ||
+ | which as you can see both yield 35 atoms. Now, | ||
+ | |||
+ | rms_cur A, D | ||
+ | won't work, due to the aforementioned reason. To fix this, one needs to do, | ||
+ | |||
+ | alter all,segi="" | ||
+ | alter all,chain="" | ||
+ | alter D, resi=str(int(resi)+1) # I don't actually use this line | ||
+ | and now | ||
+ | |||
+ | rms_cur A, D | ||
+ | |||
+ | should work. | ||
===SEE ALSO=== | ===SEE ALSO=== | ||
− | + | [[Fit]], [[Rms_Cur]], [[Intra_Fit]], [[Intra_Rms]], [[Intra_Rms_Cur]], [[Pair_Fit]] | |
− | [[Category:Commands| | + | [http://www.mail-archive.com/pymol-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg00001.html Warren DeLano's comment on rms_* and commands.] |
+ | [[Category:Commands|Rms]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Structure_Alignment|Rms]] |
Latest revision as of 03:09, 28 March 2014
Rms computes a RMS fit between two atom selections, but does not tranform the models after performing the fit.
USAGE
rms (selection), (target-selection)
EXAMPLES
fit ( mutant and name ca ), ( wildtype and name ca )
USER COMMENTS
To determine the RMS without any fitting, see Rms_Cur
Fit, Rms, Rms_Cur are finicky and only work when all atom identifiers match: segi, chain, resn, name, alt. If they don't then you'll need to use the alter command to change the identifiers to that they do -- typically that means clearing out the SEGI field, renaming chains, and sometimes renumbering.
I tried made two selections A, and D as
PyMOL>sel A, 1gh2 and n. CA and i. 65-99 Selector: selection "A" defined with 35 atoms. PyMOL>sel D, 1kao and n. CA and i. 64-98 Selector: selection "D" defined with 35 atoms
which as you can see both yield 35 atoms. Now,
rms_cur A, D
won't work, due to the aforementioned reason. To fix this, one needs to do,
alter all,segi="" alter all,chain="" alter D, resi=str(int(resi)+1) # I don't actually use this line
and now
rms_cur A, D
should work.